People v. Cheuveret

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cheuveret

305 A.D.2d 137, 757 N.Y.S.2d 842, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4944

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 6, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 305 A.D.2d 137 (People v. Cheuveret) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Cheuveret, 305 A.D.2d 137, 757 N.Y.S.2d 842, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4944 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered November 29, 2001, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fourth degrees, criminally using drug paraphernalia in the second degree (three counts) and resisting arrest, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of SVs to 10 years, unanimously affirmed. The matter is remitted to Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

The court properly precluded defendant from introducing a statement made by a codefendant as a purported declaration against penal interest. There were no supporting circumstances to attest to the statement’s reliability (see People v Settles, 46 NY2d 154, 167-170 [1978]).

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence warranted the inference of defendant’s guilt under the theory of constructive possession (see People v Bundy, 90 NY2d 918 [1997]; People v Abreu, 261 AD2d 297 [1999], lv denied 93 NY2d 1013 [1999]) and under the drug factory presumption (see Penal Law § 220.25 [2]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Sullivan and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered November 29, 2001, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fourth degrees, criminally using drug paraphernalia in the second degree (three counts) and resisting arrest, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of SVs to 10 years, unanimously affirmed. The matter is remitted to Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

The court properly precluded defendant from introducing a statement made by a codefendant as a purported declaration against penal interest. There were no supporting circumstances to attest to the statement’s reliability (see People v Settles, 46 NY2d 154, 167-170 [1978]).

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence warranted the inference of defendant’s guilt under the theory of constructive possession (see People v Bundy, 90 NY2d 918 [1997]; People v Abreu, 261 AD2d 297 [1999], lv denied 93 NY2d 1013 [1999]) and under the drug factory presumption (see Penal Law § 220.25 [2]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Sullivan and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

305 A.D.2d 137, 757 N.Y.S.2d 842, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cheuveret-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack