People v. Chestnut

142 A.D.3d 559, 36 N.Y.S.3d 396
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 10, 2016·No. 2015-03178·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— Appeal by the de-

fendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), imposed March 10, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Worrell, 138 AD3d 1154, 1155 [2016]; People v Medina, 138 AD3d 1148 [2016]), and thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Rivera, Dickerson, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Chestnut, 142 A.D.3d 559, 36 N.Y.S.3d 396 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

142 A.D.3d 559 (People v. Chestnut) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rosa-Gomez
2019 NY Slip Op 1103 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Rodriguez
2018 NY Slip Op 8334 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)