People v. Chestnut

142 A.D.3d 559, 36 N.Y.S.3d 396
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 10, 2016
Docket2015-03178
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 142 A.D.3d 559 (People v. Chestnut) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Chestnut, 142 A.D.3d 559, 36 N.Y.S.3d 396 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

— Appeal by the de-

fendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), imposed March 10, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Worrell, 138 AD3d 1154, 1155 [2016]; People v Medina, 138 AD3d 1148 [2016]), and thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Rivera, Dickerson, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Rosa-Gomez
2019 NY Slip Op 1103 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Rodriguez
2018 NY Slip Op 8334 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
142 A.D.3d 559, 36 N.Y.S.3d 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-chestnut-nyappdiv-2016.