People v. Cherry

60 A.D.3d 484, 873 N.Y.S.2d 909
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 12, 2009·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Eduardo Padro, J.), entered on or about February 15, 2007, which adjudicated defendant a level three offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record supports the court’s discretionary upward departure to a level three sex offender adjudication. There was clear and convincing evidence of factors, not adequately accounted for in the risk assessment instrument, demonstrating that defendant has a high risk of reoffending (see e.g. People v O’Flaherty, 23 AD3d 237 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 705 [2006]). Concur — Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Acosta and Renwick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cherry, 60 A.D.3d 484, 873 N.Y.S.2d 909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

60 A.D.3d 484 (People v. Cherry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Diaz
84 A.D.3d 769 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Lyons
72 A.D.3d 776 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)