People v. Cherry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cherry

49 A.D.2d 860, 374 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11038

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 28, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 49 A.D.2d 860 (People v. Cherry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Cherry, 49 A.D.2d 860, 374 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11038 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered June 21, 1973, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree, unanimously modified, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of changing it to one of conviction for the crime of grand larceny in the third degree and remitting the case for resentence. The evidence adduced at the trial established to the jury’s satisfaction that defendant "grabbed” a decoy officer’s arm and "jerked” him up off a park bench while an accomplice pulled out the officer’s wallet, ripping the button which secured the pocket in the process. The trial court properly submitted the robbery and larceny counts to the jury in the alternative (CPL 300.40, subd 3, par [b]) and the jury found defendant guilty of the greater count. Unfortunately, in the course of his charge to the jury the Trial Judge improperly advised it that the mere "touching” of the victim was the equivalent of physical force and used a concededly erroneous illustration to explain the difference between robbery and larceny. In view of the closeness of the question as to which crime had in fact been committed, we believe the interests of justice would be best served by reducing appellant’s conviction to one for the lesser included offense. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Lupiano, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered June 21, 1973, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree, unanimously modified, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of changing it to one of conviction for the crime of grand larceny in the third degree and remitting the case for resentence. The evidence adduced at the trial established to the jury’s satisfaction that defendant "grabbed” a decoy officer’s arm and "jerked” him up off a park bench while an accomplice pulled out the officer’s wallet, ripping the button which secured the pocket in the process. The trial court properly submitted the robbery and larceny counts to the jury in the alternative (CPL 300.40, subd 3, par [b]) and the jury found defendant guilty of the greater count. Unfortunately, in the course of his charge to the jury the Trial Judge improperly advised it that the mere "touching” of the victim was the equivalent of physical force and used a concededly erroneous illustration to explain the difference between robbery and larceny. In view of the closeness of the question as to which crime had in fact been committed, we believe the interests of justice would be best served by reducing appellant’s conviction to one for the lesser included offense. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Lupiano, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 860, 374 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11038, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cherry-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack