People v. Cherry

32 A.D.2d 812, 302 N.Y.S.2d 297, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3737

This text of 32 A.D.2d 812 (People v. Cherry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Cherry, 32 A.D.2d 812, 302 N.Y.S.2d 297, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3737 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 4, 1967, affirmed. Defendant’s contention that his guilty plea was induced by the existence or threatened use of the fruits of an alleged illegal search and seizure is not properly before us. “Evidence dehors the record is not admissible in an appellate court for the purpose of reversing a judgment ” (People v. Vignera, 29 A D 2d 657). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 A.D.2d 812, 302 N.Y.S.2d 297, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cherry-nyappdiv-1969.