People v. Cheristin

2025 NY Slip Op 03340
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 4, 2025
DocketInd. No. 701/21
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 03340 (People v. Cheristin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Cheristin, 2025 NY Slip Op 03340 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

People v Cheristin (2025 NY Slip Op 03340)
People v Cheristin
2025 NY Slip Op 03340
Decided on June 4, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 4, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
BARRY E. WARHIT
DONNA-MARIE E. GOLIA, JJ.

2022-09896
(Ind. No. 701/21)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Joshua Cheristin, appellant.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Sarah B. Cohen of counsel), for appellant.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill, Danielle M. O'Boyle, and Maryam Sheikh of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dineen Riviezzo, J.), rendered October 20, 2022, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record demonstrates that he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his challenge to the Supreme Court's denial of that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence (see People v Hightower-Castro, 219 AD3d 504, 505; People v Camacho, 179 AD3d 831, 831-832; People v Kornegay, 60 AD3d 696, 696).

BARROS, J.P., CHAMBERS, WARHIT and GOLIA, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Camacho
2020 NY Slip Op 294 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Kornegay
60 A.D.3d 696 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Hightower-Castro
219 A.D.3d 504 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 03340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cheristin-nyappdiv-2025.