People v. Chenphang

102 A.D.3d 884, 957 N.Y.S.2d 897
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 23, 2013
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 102 A.D.3d 884 (People v. Chenphang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Chenphang, 102 A.D.3d 884, 957 N.Y.S.2d 897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), imposed February 4, 2011, upon her plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of her right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v DeSimone, 80 NY2d 273, 283 [1992]) and, thus, does not preclude review of her excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Dillon, Chambers and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. McCoy
109 A.D.3d 939 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 A.D.3d 884, 957 N.Y.S.2d 897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-chenphang-nyappdiv-2013.