People v. Cheers
Opinion
After waiving examination, appellant pled guilty on arraignment to a charge of breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony. Appellant appeals the subsequent denial of her motion to withdraw the guilty plea.
The record describes a procedure within the ambit of recent guilty plea decisions of the Michigan Supreme Court. People v. Dunn (1968), 380 Mich 693; People v. Stearns (1968), 380 Mich 704; People v. Winegar (1968), 380 Mich 719. Although defend[591] ant was intoxicated at the time of the crime, her testimony was sufficiently inculpatory to infer the requisite intent to commit a felony. We find neither prejudicial error nor a miscarriage of justice.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
164 N.W.2d 785 (People v. Cheers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.