People v. Cheeks

161 A.D.2d 657
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 14, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 161 A.D.2d 657 (People v. Cheeks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Cheeks, 161 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kohn, J.), rendered August 31, 1987, convicting him of assault in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the indictment is dismissed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50.

The evidence adduced at trial was legally insufficient to establish that the complainant suffered "physical impairment” (People v McDowell, 28 NY2d 373, 375), or "substantial pain” (Matter of Phillip A., 49 NY2d 198, 200). General undeveloped assertions that a victim felt pain when hit does not establish "physical injury” (see, Penal Law § 10.00 [9]; People v Holden, 148 AD2d 635; People v Williams, 101 AD2d 870). Here, the complainant testified that he experienced pain when the defendant hit him twice over the head with a gun. However, he did not indicate the duration or degree of pain. He also testified that he did not seek medical assistance or treatment. The only other testimony adduced relative to his injury was an officer’s observation of a "small abrasion” on the complainant’s head. Thus, the witnesses never elaborated on the duration or degree of the pain, nor provided some other objective indicia of "substantial pain” to properly sustain a charge of assault in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.00 [1]). Kunzeman, J. P., Rubin, Eiber and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bermudez (Guillermo)
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018
People v. Williams
2017 NY Slip Op 329 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Ross
119 A.D.3d 961 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Mighty
109 A.D.3d 841 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Rahman
84 A.D.3d 1119 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Zalevsky
82 A.D.3d 1136 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Stearns
72 A.D.3d 1214 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Plate
2003 NY Slip Op 51503 (New York Town and Village Courts, 2003)
People v. Bumbury
263 A.D.2d 512 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
People v. Sanders
245 A.D.2d 471 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Brown
243 A.D.2d 749 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Alexander
190 A.D.2d 1052 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
In re Scott QQ.
187 A.D.2d 867 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 A.D.2d 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cheeks-nyappdiv-1990.