People v. Cheaz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cheaz

305 A.D.2d 423, 758 N.Y.S.2d 513, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5137

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 5, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 305 A.D.2d 423 (People v. Cheaz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Cheaz, 305 A.D.2d 423, 758 N.Y.S.2d 513, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County [424]*424(Cacciabaudo, J.), rendered January 30, 2001, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court properly denied his request for jury instructions regarding prior inconsistent statements. The instances cited by the defendant either did not involve prior inconsistent statements or were of so little significance as not to require jury instruction.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Feuerstein, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County [424]*424(Cacciabaudo, J.), rendered January 30, 2001, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court properly denied his request for jury instructions regarding prior inconsistent statements. The instances cited by the defendant either did not involve prior inconsistent statements or were of so little significance as not to require jury instruction.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Feuerstein, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

305 A.D.2d 423, 758 N.Y.S.2d 513, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cheaz-nyappdiv-2003.