Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Cheatham

People v. Cheatham

109 A.D.3d 838, 971 N.Y.S.2d 57
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 11, 2013
StatusPublished

This text of 109 A.D.3d 838 (People v. Cheatham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Cheatham, 109 A.D.3d 838, 971 N.Y.S.2d 57 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Reichbach, J.), imposed January 6, 2010, upon her plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of her right to appeal precludes review of her contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-256 [2006]). Eng, P.J., Mastro, Dickerson, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 A.D.3d 838, 971 N.Y.S.2d 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cheatham-nyappdiv-2013.