People v. Chavis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Chavis

297 A.D.2d 349, 746 N.Y.2d 399, 746 N.Y.S.2d 399, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7989

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 19, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 297 A.D.2d 349 (People v. Chavis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Chavis, 297 A.D.2d 349, 746 N.Y.2d 399, 746 N.Y.S.2d 399, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7989 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

[350]*350Upon our review of the record, we find that there are issues, including those raised in the defendant’s supplemental pro se brief, which are “arguable on the merits * * * and therefore not frivolous” (Anders v California supra at 744). Accordingly, assignment of new counsel is warranted (see Anders v California, supra; People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633). Prudenti, P.J., S. Miller, O’Brien, McGinity and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[350]*350Upon our review of the record, we find that there are issues, including those raised in the defendant’s supplemental pro se brief, which are “arguable on the merits * * * and therefore not frivolous” (Anders v California supra at 744). Accordingly, assignment of new counsel is warranted (see Anders v California, supra; People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633). Prudenti, P.J., S. Miller, O’Brien, McGinity and Crane, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

297 A.D.2d 349, 746 N.Y.2d 399, 746 N.Y.S.2d 399, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7989, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-chavis-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack