People v. Chavis
297 A.D.2d 349, 746 N.Y.2d 399, 746 N.Y.S.2d 399, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7989
Opinion
[350]*350Upon our review of the record, we find that there are issues, including those raised in the defendant’s supplemental pro se brief, which are “arguable on the merits * * * and therefore not frivolous” (Anders v California supra at 744). Accordingly, assignment of new counsel is warranted (see Anders v California, supra; People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633). Prudenti, P.J., S. Miller, O’Brien, McGinity and Crane, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Chavis, 297 A.D.2d 349, 746 N.Y.2d 399, 746 N.Y.S.2d 399, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7989 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).
297 A.D.2d 349 (People v. Chavis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Stokes
744 N.E.2d 1153 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)