People v. Chavez

524 P.2d 307, 185 Colo. 310, 1974 Colo. LEXIS 915
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedJuly 1, 1974
DocketNo. 25993
StatusPublished

This text of 524 P.2d 307 (People v. Chavez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Chavez, 524 P.2d 307, 185 Colo. 310, 1974 Colo. LEXIS 915 (Colo. 1974).

Opinions

MR. JUSTICE KELLEY

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Defendant appeals from an order of the District .Court of Pueblo County dismissing his motion for Postconviction Review, pursuant to 1971 Perm. Supp., C.R.S. 1963, 40-1-510(1 )(f). We affirm.

The record shows that the defendant was convicted by a jury of statutory rape on April 16, 1970. On May 18, 1970, the defendant was sentenced to the Colorado State Penitentiary. The judgment of conviction became final on September 13, 1972, when rehearing on his appeal to this court was denied. See People v. Chavez, 179 Colo. 316, 500 P.2d 365 (1972). On January 19, 1973, defendant filed his motion for postconviction review in the district court.

Defendant’s motion is based on significant amendments in the Criminal Code regarding statutory rape. These amendments became effective as of July 1, 1972, while defendant’s appeal was pending but before he filed his motion for postconviction relief.

This court recently addressed itself to the issue of the constitutionality of section 510(1)(f) in People v. Herrera, 183 Colo. 155, 516 P.2d 626 (1973). In Herrera we held that section 510(1)(f) constituted an unconstitutional infringement upon the governor’s exclusive power of commutation. See Colorado Constitution, Article IV, Section 7, People v. District Court, 180 Colo. 107, 502 P.2d 420 (1972).

[312]*312This case presents a slightly different situation than Herrera in that the change in the substantive law took effect during the pendency of defendant’s appeal. People v. Arellano, 185 Colo. 280, 524 P.2d 305 (1974), announced contemporaneously with this opinion controls here. Arellano holds that once a conviction has become final, any remedy lies in the Executive Department by way of commutation. The judgment is affirmed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE PRINGLE and MR. JUSTICE DAY dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Arellano
524 P.2d 305 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1974)
People Ex Rel. Dunbar v. DISTRICT CT., TWENTIETH JD
502 P.2d 420 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1972)
People v. Herrera
516 P.2d 626 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1973)
People v. Chavez
500 P.2d 365 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
524 P.2d 307, 185 Colo. 310, 1974 Colo. LEXIS 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-chavez-colo-1974.