People v. Charlton

247 A.D.2d 628, 668 N.Y.S.2d 488, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1711
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 23, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 247 A.D.2d 628 (People v. Charlton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Charlton, 247 A.D.2d 628, 668 N.Y.S.2d 488, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1711 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kohm, J., at trial; Schulman, J., at sentencing), rendered October 23, 1995, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court’s determination that the courtroom would be closed during the testimony of the undercover officer was appropriate and not overbroad (see, e.g., People v Martinez, 82 NY2d 436; People v Mitchell, 209 AD2d 444).

Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. K.U.
37 Misc. 3d 551 (New York Supreme Court, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 A.D.2d 628, 668 N.Y.S.2d 488, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-charlton-nyappdiv-1998.