People v. Charlton

247 A.D.2d 628, 668 N.Y.S.2d 488, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1711
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 23, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kohm, J., at trial; Schulman, J., at sentencing), rendered October 23, 1995, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court’s determination that the courtroom would be closed during the testimony of the undercover officer was appropriate and not overbroad (see, e.g., People v Martinez, 82 NY2d 436; People v Mitchell, 209 AD2d 444).

Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Charlton, 247 A.D.2d 628, 668 N.Y.S.2d 488, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1711 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

247 A.D.2d 628 (People v. Charlton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. K.U.
37 Misc. 3d 551 (New York Supreme Court, 2012)