People v. Charette

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Charette

57 A.D.2d 594, 393 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11590

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 18, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 57 A.D.2d 594 (People v. Charette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Charette, 57 A.D.2d 594, 393 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11590 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered March 26, 1976, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal also brings up for review an order of the same court, dated September 19, 1975, which denied, without a hearing, defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground of prejudicial delay between the date of the criminal transaction alleged in the indictment and the filing of the sealed indictment. Case remanded to the County Court for a hearing and a new determination on defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment upon the ground that there had been prejudicial preindictment delay, and appeal held in abeyance in the interim. The mere claim by the District Attorney of an ongoing narcotics investigation, and the need to protect the undercover police operative, is an insufficient basis upon which to deny, without a hearing, a motion to dismiss an indictment upon the ground of preindictment delay, where a potential for prejudice to the defendant’s rights appears and is raised. Under such circumstances, this court has held that a hearing is required (see People v Townsend, 38 AD2d 569; see, also, People v Valentin, 46 AD2d 906; People v Lewis, 49 AD2d 912). Cohalan, Acting P. J., Hawkins, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered March 26, 1976, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal also brings up for review an order of the same court, dated September 19, 1975, which denied, without a hearing, defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground of prejudicial delay between the date of the criminal transaction alleged in the indictment and the filing of the sealed indictment. Case remanded to the County Court for a hearing and a new determination on defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment upon the ground that there had been prejudicial preindictment delay, and appeal held in abeyance in the interim. The mere claim by the District Attorney of an ongoing narcotics investigation, and the need to protect the undercover police operative, is an insufficient basis upon which to deny, without a hearing, a motion to dismiss an indictment upon the ground of preindictment delay, where a potential for prejudice to the defendant’s rights appears and is raised. Under such circumstances, this court has held that a hearing is required (see People v Townsend, 38 AD2d 569; see, also, People v Valentin, 46 AD2d 906; People v Lewis, 49 AD2d 912). Cohalan, Acting P. J., Hawkins, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 A.D.2d 594, 393 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-charette-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack