People v. . Charbineau

New York Court of Appeals

People v. . Charbineau

22 N.E. 271, 115 N.Y. 433, 26 N.Y. St. Rep. 490, 70 Sickels 433, 1889 N.Y. LEXIS 1222

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 8, 1889

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 22 N.E. 271 (People v. . Charbineau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. . Charbineau, 22 N.E. 271, 115 N.Y. 433, 26 N.Y. St. Rep. 490, 70 Sickels 433, 1889 N.Y. LEXIS 1222 (N.Y. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Earl, J.

The defendant was indicted by the grand jury of Franklin county for selling spirituous liquors without a license. The indictment contains two counts, each alleging a sale of liquor on the same day, at the same place and to the same person without a license. The sole difference between the counts is that in the first the defendant is charged with selling liquor in quantities less than five gallons; and in the second he is charged with selling liquor to be drank upon his premises. The defendant demurred to the indictment upon the grounds that more than one crime is charged therein, and that the facts 'Stated therein do not constitute a crime.

Section 278 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides that an “ indictment must charge but one crime and in one form, except as in the next section provided; ” and that provides that “the crime may be charged in separate counts to have been committed by different means; and when the acts complained of may constitute different crimes, such crimes may be charged in separate counts.” The learned counsel for the ■defendant contends that the sale of spirituous liquors without -a license, 'in violation of sections 13 and 14 of the act chapter '628 of the Laws of 1857, is not a criminal offense, because the law does not declare it to be a crime. His ingenious argument 'would be entitled to some consideration if the question were an open one. But for more than thirty years, the courts construing the act have held such sales to be crimes j and that construction which is in harmony with all the previous laws upon the same subject, which is in accordance with the common understanding, and which has been acquiesced in by the legislature, should prevail. In Behan v. People (17 N. Y., 516) this court, by a unanimous decision, held that the sale of spirituous liquors without a license in less quantities than five gallons at a time, though not among the offenses specially declared misdemeanors by the act of 1857, is punishable by indictment; and while that decision has been somewhat criti *437 cised it has been uniformly followed and approved since. (Hill v. People, 20 N. Y. 363; Foote v. People, 56 id. 321; People v. Hislop, 77 id. 331; Jefferson v. People, 101 id. 19; People v. Frank, 110 id. 488.) We must, therefore, hold that the indictment charges a crime.

Does it charge more than one crime in violation of the section of the Code above quoted % We think not. The indictment charges but one act, and that is a sale without a license at a specified time and place to a person named. 'If there was a sale of less than five gallons of liquor to be drank upon the premises of the defendant, then it was a crime under both sections 13 and 14 of the act of 1857; and hence, under section 279 of the Code, the act complained of may constitute different crimes, and, therefore, may be charged in separate counts.

The judgment should, therefore, be affirmed.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Earl, J.

The defendant was indicted by the grand jury of Franklin county for selling spirituous liquors without a license. The indictment contains two counts, each alleging a sale of liquor on the same day, at the same place and to the same person without a license. The sole difference between the counts is that in the first the defendant is charged with selling liquor in quantities less than five gallons; and in the second he is charged with selling liquor to be drank upon his premises. The defendant demurred to the indictment upon the grounds that more than one crime is charged therein, and that the facts 'Stated therein do not constitute a crime.

Section 278 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides that an “ indictment must charge but one crime and in one form, except as in the next section provided; ” and that provides that “the crime may be charged in separate counts to have been committed by different means; and when the acts complained of may constitute different crimes, such crimes may be charged in separate counts.” The learned counsel for the ■defendant contends that the sale of spirituous liquors without -a license, 'in violation of sections 13 and 14 of the act chapter '628 of the Laws of 1857, is not a criminal offense, because the law does not declare it to be a crime. His ingenious argument 'would be entitled to some consideration if the question were an open one. But for more than thirty years, the courts construing the act have held such sales to be crimes j and that construction which is in harmony with all the previous laws upon the same subject, which is in accordance with the common understanding, and which has been acquiesced in by the legislature, should prevail. In Behan v. People (17 N. Y., 516) this court, by a unanimous decision, held that the sale of spirituous liquors without a license in less quantities than five gallons at a time, though not among the offenses specially declared misdemeanors by the act of 1857, is punishable by indictment; and while that decision has been somewhat criti *437 cised it has been uniformly followed and approved since. (Hill v. People, 20 N. Y. 363; Foote v. People, 56 id. 321; People v. Hislop, 77 id. 331; Jefferson v. People, 101 id. 19; People v. Frank, 110 id. 488.) We must, therefore, hold that the indictment charges a crime.

Does it charge more than one crime in violation of the section of the Code above quoted % We think not. The indictment charges but one act, and that is a sale without a license at a specified time and place to a person named. 'If there was a sale of less than five gallons of liquor to be drank upon the premises of the defendant, then it was a crime under both sections 13 and 14 of the act of 1857; and hence, under section 279 of the Code, the act complained of may constitute different crimes, and, therefore, may be charged in separate counts.

The judgment should, therefore, be affirmed.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 N.E. 271, 115 N.Y. 433, 26 N.Y. St. Rep. 490, 70 Sickels 433, 1889 N.Y. LEXIS 1222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-charbineau-ny-1889.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack