People v. Chanza
This text of 152 A.D.2d 592 (People v. Chanza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.), rendered November 25, 1987, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of 8 Vs to 25 years’ imprisonment to run consecutively to three concurrent indeterminate terms of 5 to 15 years’ imprisonment.
Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by providing that all the indeterminate terms of imprisonment shall run concurrently; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.
There is no merit in the defendant’s contention that he was deprived of a fair trial by the instances of alleged prosecutorial misconduct of which he complains. Further, we do not find that the court’s charge, when viewed as a whole, failed to instruct the jury adequately on the concept of acting in concert.
We agree, however, that the sentence imposed for assault in the first degree should run concurrently to the sentence [593]*593imposed for manslaughter in the first degree and modify the judgment accordingly (see, People v Medina, 152 AD2d 602 [decided herewith]).
We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit (see, People v Medina, supra). Mollen, P. J., Spatt, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
152 A.D.2d 592, 543 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-chanza-nyappdiv-1989.