People v. Chandler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Chandler

201 A.D.2d 812, 608 N.Y.S.2d 895, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1132

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 10, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 201 A.D.2d 812 (People v. Chandler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Chandler, 201 A.D.2d 812, 608 N.Y.S.2d 895, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1132 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Harrigan, J.), rendered December 21, 1992, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (six counts), criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (six counts) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (six counts).

We have reviewed the record and brief submitted by defense counsel and agree that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on defendant’s appeal. Defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is therefore granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III and Weiss, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Harrigan, J.), rendered December 21, 1992, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (six counts), criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (six counts) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (six counts).

We have reviewed the record and brief submitted by defense counsel and agree that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on defendant’s appeal. Defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is therefore granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III and Weiss, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 A.D.2d 812, 608 N.Y.S.2d 895, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-chandler-nyappdiv-1994.