People v. Chandler

122 A.D.2d 952, 505 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59440
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Chandler. Read the opinion of the Court — 110 A.D.2d 970

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Reilly, J.), rendered March 6, 1981, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Natasi, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Judgment affirmed.

Based upon a review of the record of the suppression hearing, we conclude that the photo array viewed by the witnesses was not impermissibly suggestive (see, People v Berrios, 28 NY2d 361; People v Shea, 54 AD2d 722).

The single improper statement in the prosecutor’s summation was cured by a prompt and clear instruction from the trial court (see, People v Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105, 111). Brown, J. P., Niehoff, Rubin and Runzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Chandler, 122 A.D.2d 952, 505 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59440 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

122 A.D.2d 952 (People v. Chandler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Berrios
28 N.Y.2d 361 (New York Court of Appeals, 1971)
People v. Ashwal
347 N.E.2d 564 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
People v. Shea
54 A.D.2d 722 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)