People v. Chandler
726 N.W.2d 423
This text of 726 N.W.2d 423 (People v. Chandler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Chandler, 726 N.W.2d 423 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Clinton Deon CHANDLER, a/k/a Clinton Hopson, a/k/a Dion Mills, a/k/a Clinton Mills, a/k/a David Earl Chandler, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 29, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to remand is DENIED.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
726 N.W.2d 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-chandler-mich-2007.