People v. Chan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Chan

87 A.D.2d 892, 449 N.Y.S.2d 525, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16403

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 26, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 87 A.D.2d 892 (People v. Chan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Chan, 87 A.D.2d 892, 449 N.Y.S.2d 525, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16403 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leahy, J.), rendered July 2,1981, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, a class C violent felony, on his plea of guilty, and sentencing him as a juvenile offender to an indeterminate term of imprisonment with a maximum of six years and a minimum of two years. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to an indeterminate term of imprisonment with a maximum of three years and a minimum of one year. As so modified, judgment affirmed. In making this modification, we note that the defendant, who was 15 years old at the time of the offense, had no previous adjudication of having committed a designated felony act as defined in subdivision (h) of section 712 of the Family Court Act (see CPL 220.10, subd 5, par [g], subpar [iii], cl [2], subcl [iv]). The trial court properly denied defendant youthful offender treatment since no mitigating circumstances were established that bear directly on the manner in which the crime was committed in order that defendant may qualify as an eligible youth (see CPL 720.10, subd 3, par [i]; see, also, People v O’Neill, 86 AD2d 213). Weinstein, J. P., Thompson, Bracken and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leahy, J.), rendered July 2,1981, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, a class C violent felony, on his plea of guilty, and sentencing him as a juvenile offender to an indeterminate term of imprisonment with a maximum of six years and a minimum of two years. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to an indeterminate term of imprisonment with a maximum of three years and a minimum of one year. As so modified, judgment affirmed. In making this modification, we note that the defendant, who was 15 years old at the time of the offense, had no previous adjudication of having committed a designated felony act as defined in subdivision (h) of section 712 of the Family Court Act (see CPL 220.10, subd 5, par [g], subpar [iii], cl [2], subcl [iv]). The trial court properly denied defendant youthful offender treatment since no mitigating circumstances were established that bear directly on the manner in which the crime was committed in order that defendant may qualify as an eligible youth (see CPL 720.10, subd 3, par [i]; see, also, People v O’Neill, 86 AD2d 213). Weinstein, J. P., Thompson, Bracken and Brown, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 A.D.2d 892, 449 N.Y.S.2d 525, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-chan-nyappdiv-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack