People v. Champion
This text of 497 N.W.2d 193 (People v. Champion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of two counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520b(l)(c); MSA 28.788(2) (l)(c), two counts of armed robbery, MCL 750.529; MSA 28.797, and one count of breaking and entering, MCL 750.110; MSA 28.305. The trial court then found defendant guilty of being a third-felony offender, MCL 769.11; MSA 28.1083. He was sentenced to sixty to ninety years’ imprisonment. He appeals as of right, and we reverse.
Defendant argues that he was denied his constitutional right to a twelve-person jury because his waiver of a full jury was coerced and because his waiver was taken before twelve jurors were impaneled. MCR 6.410(A) provides in pertinent part:
After a jury of 12 or more jurors has been impaneled and before a verdict is returned, the parties may stipulate with the court’s consent to have the case decided by a specified number of jurors less than 12.
In the present case, the trial court allowed defendant to stipulate that the jury could consist of eleven jurors before a jury of twelve was impaneled. Accordingly, we find that reversal is warranted. As a result of our disposition of this issue, we need not address defendant’s remaining issues.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
497 N.W.2d 193, 198 Mich. App. 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-champion-michctapp-1993.