People v. Chambliss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Chambliss

4 A.D.3d 795, 771 N.Y.S.2d 453, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1372

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 11, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 4 A.D.3d 795 (People v. Chambliss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Chambliss, 4 A.D.3d 795, 771 N.Y.S.2d 453, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1372 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Joseph E. Fahey, J.), rendered December 17, 2002. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [3]), robbery in the second degree (§ 160.10 [2] [a]), grand larceny in the fourth degree (§ 155.30 [5]), and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (§ 265.02 [1]). We reject defendant’s contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). We also reject the contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel (see People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]). The sentence is not unduly harsh or se[796]*796vere. Present—Green, J.E, Wisner, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Joseph E. Fahey, J.), rendered December 17, 2002. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [3]), robbery in the second degree (§ 160.10 [2] [a]), grand larceny in the fourth degree (§ 155.30 [5]), and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (§ 265.02 [1]). We reject defendant’s contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). We also reject the contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel (see People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]). The sentence is not unduly harsh or se[796]*796vere. Present—Green, J.E, Wisner, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 A.D.3d 795, 771 N.Y.S.2d 453, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-chambliss-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack