People v. Chambers

2018 NY Slip Op 1198
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 21, 2018
Docket2015-11146
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 1198 (People v. Chambers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Chambers, 2018 NY Slip Op 1198 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

People v Chambers (2018 NY Slip Op 01198)
People v Chambers
2018 NY Slip Op 01198
Decided on February 21, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 21, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P.
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.

2015-11146
(Ind. No. 14-00508)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Jahvonne Chambers, appellant.


Mark Diamond, New York, NY, for appellant.

Anthony A. Scarpino, Jr., District Attorney, White Plains, NY (John Carmody and Steven A. Bender of counsel; Angelo Massagli on the brief), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barry E. Warhit, J.), rendered September 24, 2015, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention relating to his waiver of inquiry pursuant to People v Outley (80 NY2d 702) is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05[2]; see also People v Humbach, 153 AD3d 637, 637-638; cf. People v Williams, 27 NY3d 212; People v Murray, 15 NY3d 725, 726-727). We decline to review the defendant's contention in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see People v Humbach, 153 AD3d at 638).

The defendant's challenge to the final order of protection entered against him is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Nieves, 2 NY3d 310, 316-318; People v Kumar, 127 AD3d 882, 883). We decline to review the defendant's contention in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see People v Kennedy, 151 AD3d 1079, 1079-1080; People v Bernardini, 142 AD3d 671, 672; People v Hunter, 135 AD3d 958, 959; People v Kumar, 127 AD3d at 883).

BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, CHAMBERS and MILLER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Nieves
811 N.E.2d 13 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
People v. Murray
932 N.E.2d 877 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)
People v. Kumar
127 A.D.3d 882 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Hunter
135 A.D.3d 958 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
The People v. Christian Williams
51 N.E.3d 528 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)
People v. Bernardini
142 A.D.3d 671 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Kennedy
2017 NY Slip Op 5242 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Humbach
2017 NY Slip Op 6084 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Outley
80 N.Y.2d 702 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 1198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-chambers-nyappdiv-2018.