People v. Chambers

66 A.D.3d 748, 887 N.Y.S.2d 220
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 13, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 66 A.D.3d 748 (People v. Chambers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Chambers, 66 A.D.3d 748, 887 N.Y.S.2d 220 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brennan, J.), dated January 9, 2008, as, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The People met their burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, risk factors bearing sufficient total points to support a level two sex offender adjudication pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C. The defendant was properly assessed points for drug or alcohol abuse, as he admitted abusing drugs at the time he committed the offense (see People v Carpenter, 60 AD3d 833 [2009]; People v Morales, 33 AD3d 982, 983 [2006]; Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 15 [2006]). Moreover, the defendant allocated that he was in possession of a BB-gun at the time of the commission of the crime and threatened to put a “cap” in the victim at the time of the incident if she did not comply with his command. Accordingly, the Feople presented clear and convincing evidence that the defendant was armed with a dangerous instrument at the time of the offense (see People v Walker, 15 AD3d 692 [2005]; cf. People v Swain, 46 AD3d 1157, 1158 [2007]), and should be designated a presumptive risk level two. Skelos, J.P., Covello, Leventhal and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Daniel
2021 NY Slip Op 04501 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Shkreli
115 A.D.3d 728 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Dash
111 A.D.3d 907 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Grubbs
107 A.D.3d 771 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Lacewell
103 A.D.3d 784 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Finizio
100 A.D.3d 977 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Harris
100 A.D.3d 727 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Thompson
95 A.D.3d 977 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Crandall
90 A.D.3d 628 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. King
80 A.D.3d 681 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Iorio
74 A.D.3d 1306 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 A.D.3d 748, 887 N.Y.S.2d 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-chambers-nyappdiv-2009.