People v. Chambers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Chambers

242 A.D.2d 860, 665 N.Y.S.2d 362, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10382

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 30, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 242 A.D.2d 860 (People v. Chambers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Chambers, 242 A.D.2d 860, 665 N.Y.S.2d 362, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10382 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of burglary in the second degree, imposing a seven-year determinate sentence of imprisonment, and ordering him to pay restitution in the amount of $2,418.81. Defendant contends that County Court erred in ordering restitution without conducting a hearing.

Defense counsel waived defendant’s right to a restitution hearing, expressly stating that defendant “doesn’t wish to contest [the amount of restitution] any further” (see, People v Kelly, 238 AD2d 938; People v Lugo, 191 AD2d 648). (Appeal from Judgment of Livingston County Court, Alonzo, J.—Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of burglary in the second degree, imposing a seven-year determinate sentence of imprisonment, and ordering him to pay restitution in the amount of $2,418.81. Defendant contends that County Court erred in ordering restitution without conducting a hearing.

Defense counsel waived defendant’s right to a restitution hearing, expressly stating that defendant “doesn’t wish to contest [the amount of restitution] any further” (see, People v Kelly, 238 AD2d 938; People v Lugo, 191 AD2d 648). (Appeal from Judgment of Livingston County Court, Alonzo, J.—Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 A.D.2d 860, 665 N.Y.S.2d 362, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-chambers-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack