People v. Chamberlain

278 A.D.2d 784, 722 N.Y.S.2d 930, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13473

This text of 278 A.D.2d 784 (People v. Chamberlain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Chamberlain, 278 A.D.2d 784, 722 N.Y.S.2d 930, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13473 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her after a jury trial of custodial interference in the first degree (Penal Law § 135.50 [1]). Defendant failed to preserve for our review her challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence of the knowledge element of the crime (see, People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19). We reject defendant’s remaining challenges to the legal sufficiency and weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J.— Custodial Interference, 1st Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Wisner, Kehoe and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Gray
652 N.E.2d 919 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 A.D.2d 784, 722 N.Y.S.2d 930, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-chamberlain-nyappdiv-2000.