People v. Chadwick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Chadwick

76 A.D.2d 1141, 907 N.Y.S.2d 731

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 30, 2010

StatusPublished

This text of 76 A.D.2d 1141 (People v. Chadwick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Chadwick, 76 A.D.2d 1141, 907 N.Y.S.2d 731 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Saratoga County (Scarano, J.), rendered June 6, 2008, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

In satisfaction of a three-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and waived his right to appeal. County Court thereafter sentenced defendant in accordance with the plea agreement to a prison term of two years and postrelease supervision of two years, to run consecutive to the sentence he was then serving. Defendant now appeals.

Appellate counsel for defendant seeks to be relieved of his assignment, arguing that no nonfrivolous appellate issues exist. Upon our review of the record and counsel’s brief, we agree. Thus, the judgment is affirmed and counsel’s request for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, 980 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Rose, Kavanagh and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Saratoga County (Scarano, J.), rendered June 6, 2008, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

In satisfaction of a three-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and waived his right to appeal. County Court thereafter sentenced defendant in accordance with the plea agreement to a prison term of two years and postrelease supervision of two years, to run consecutive to the sentence he was then serving. Defendant now appeals.

Appellate counsel for defendant seeks to be relieved of his assignment, arguing that no nonfrivolous appellate issues exist. Upon our review of the record and counsel’s brief, we agree. Thus, the judgment is affirmed and counsel’s request for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, 980 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Rose, Kavanagh and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 A.D.2d 1141, 907 N.Y.S.2d 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-chadwick-nyappdiv-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack