People v. Ceresoli
This text of 222 A.D.2d 1096 (People v. Ceresoli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
—Judgment affirmed. Memorandum: County Court did not err in denying defendant’s CPL 330.30 (2) motion to set aside the verdict on the ground of juror misconduct (see, People v Clark, 81 NY2d 913, 914; cf., People v Brown, 48 NY2d 388, 394; People v Harding, 44 AD2d 800). Furthermore, we decline to exercise our power to modify defendant’s sentence as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [b]).
All concur except Balio and Boehm, JJ., who dissent and vote to reverse in the following Memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
222 A.D.2d 1096, 635 N.Y.S.2d 849, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ceresoli-nyappdiv-1995.