People v. Cepeda

2020 NY Slip Op 2551, 182 A.D.3d 524, 120 N.Y.S.3d 771
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 30, 2020·No. 11438 5093N/16·Published

Opinion

People v Cepeda (2020 NY Slip Op 02551)
People v Cepeda
2020 NY Slip Op 02551
Decided on April 30, 2020
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 30, 2020
Friedman, J.P., Kapnick, Webber, Oing, JJ.

11438 5093N/16

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Jackson Cepeda, Defendant-Appellant.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (David J. Klem of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Victoria Muth of counsel), for respondent.



An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Sonberg, J.), rendered January 24, 2017,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: APRIL 30, 2020

CLERK

Counsel for appellant is referred to

§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate

Division, First Department.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cepeda, 2020 NY Slip Op 2551, 182 A.D.3d 524, 120 N.Y.S.3d 771 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

2020 NY Slip Op 2551 (People v. Cepeda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431