People v. Cepeda
This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 1897 (People v. Cepeda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Koenderman, J.), dated April 15, 2013, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The defendant’s contention that he was entitled to a downward departure from a level three sex offender status based upon the aggregate of certain factors is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Figueroa, 138 AD3d 708, 709 *943 [2016]; People v Rosales, 133 AD3d 733, 733 [2015]; People v Fernandez, 91 AD3d 737, 738 [2012]). In any event, the defendant failed to demonstrate that there existed mitigating circumstances of a kind or to a degree not otherwise adequately taken into account by the guidelines that warranted a downward departure from his presumptive level three sex offender status (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861 [2014]; People v Sanchez, 138 AD3d 946 [2016]; People v Azeez, 138 AD3d 945 [2016]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly designated the defendant a level three sex offender.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 NY Slip Op 1897, 148 A.D.3d 942, 48 N.Y.S.3d 612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cepeda-nyappdiv-2017.