People v. Cepeda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cepeda

304 A.D.2d 454, 757 N.Y.S.2d 725, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4207

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 22, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 304 A.D.2d 454 (People v. Cepeda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Cepeda, 304 A.D.2d 454, 757 N.Y.S.2d 725, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4207 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Micki Scherer, J., at suppression hearing; Ira Beal, J., at plea and sentence), rendered July 20, 2000, convicting defendant of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 13 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s plea was entered knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently, and he received meaningful representation in connection with his plea (see People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence which covers at least five knife-point robberies.

The other arguments contained in defendant’s pro se brief are foreclosed by his guilty plea or were expressly waived, and are unavailing in any event. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Micki Scherer, J., at suppression hearing; Ira Beal, J., at plea and sentence), rendered July 20, 2000, convicting defendant of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 13 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s plea was entered knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently, and he received meaningful representation in connection with his plea (see People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence which covers at least five knife-point robberies.

The other arguments contained in defendant’s pro se brief are foreclosed by his guilty plea or were expressly waived, and are unavailing in any event. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

304 A.D.2d 454, 757 N.Y.S.2d 725, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cepeda-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack