People v. Cepeda

269 A.D.2d 204, 703 N.Y.S.2d 718, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1306
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Cepeda. Read the opinion of the Court — 251 A.D.2d 343

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Allen Alpert, J.), rendered November 13, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. Defendant never requested a hearing as to the probable cause for his arrest and never raised the issue during the hearings conducted. He cannot now raise the issue for the first time on appeal. In any event, from the testimony at the hearing, the only reasonable inference that may be drawn was that defendant was arrested on the basis of a detailed, accurate description radioed by the undercover officer to the entire field team (see, People v Gonzalez, 91 NY2d 909). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cepeda, 269 A.D.2d 204, 703 N.Y.S.2d 718, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1306 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

269 A.D.2d 204 (People v. Cepeda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gonzalez
692 N.E.2d 557 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)