People v. Celi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Celi

149 A.D.3d 1548, 51 N.Y.S.3d 452

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 2017

StatusPublished

This text of 149 A.D.3d 1548 (People v. Celi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Celi, 149 A.D.3d 1548, 51 N.Y.S.3d 452 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a [1549]*1549judgment of the Oswego County Court (Donald E. Todd, J.), rendered December 15, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of murder in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a plea of guilty of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [3]). Defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal forecloses our review of his challenge to County Court’s suppression ruling (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]), and his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]).

Present— Whalen, P.J., Smith, Centra, Troutman and Scudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a [1549]*1549judgment of the Oswego County Court (Donald E. Todd, J.), rendered December 15, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of murder in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a plea of guilty of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [3]). Defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal forecloses our review of his challenge to County Court’s suppression ruling (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]), and his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]).

Present— Whalen, P.J., Smith, Centra, Troutman and Scudder, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 A.D.3d 1548, 51 N.Y.S.3d 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-celi-nyappdiv-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack