People v. Celestin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Celestin

273 A.D.2d 398, 711 N.Y.S.2d 330, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7014

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 19, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 273 A.D.2d 398 (People v. Celestin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Celestin, 273 A.D.2d 398, 711 N.Y.S.2d 330, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7014 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin, J.), rendered December 19, 1997, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree (two counts), attempted arson in the second degree, robbery in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the [399]*399People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Goldstein, J. P., McGinity, Luciano and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin, J.), rendered December 19, 1997, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree (two counts), attempted arson in the second degree, robbery in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the [399]*399People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Goldstein, J. P., McGinity, Luciano and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 A.D.2d 398, 711 N.Y.S.2d 330, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-celestin-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack