People v. Cavender

187 A.D.2d 1035, 593 N.Y.S.2d 481, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14099

This text of 187 A.D.2d 1035 (People v. Cavender) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Cavender, 187 A.D.2d 1035, 593 N.Y.S.2d 481, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14099 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The Suppression Court correctly ruled that the prosecution was not required to turn over portions of the witness’s statement and Grand Jury testimony that did not relate to the subject of his testimony at the suppression hearing (see, People v Taylor, 102 AD2d 944, 946, affd 65 NY2d 1). Further, we reject defendant’s contention that his sentence is harsh and excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J. — Sodomy, 1st Degree.) Present — Boomer, J. P., Green, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Taylor
102 A.D.2d 944 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 A.D.2d 1035, 593 N.Y.S.2d 481, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cavender-nyappdiv-1992.