People v. Cavender

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cavender

187 A.D.2d 1035, 593 N.Y.S.2d 481, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14099

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 18, 1992·Published

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The Suppression Court correctly ruled that the prosecution was not required to turn over portions of the witness’s statement and Grand Jury testimony that did not relate to the subject of his testimony at the suppression hearing (see, People v Taylor, 102 AD2d 944, 946, affd 65 NY2d 1). Further, we reject defendant’s contention that his sentence is harsh and excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J. — Sodomy, 1st Degree.) Present — Boomer, J. P., Green, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The Suppression Court correctly ruled that the prosecution was not required to turn over portions of the witness’s statement and Grand Jury testimony that did not relate to the subject of his testimony at the suppression hearing (see, People v Taylor, 102 AD2d 944, 946, affd 65 NY2d 1). Further, we reject defendant’s contention that his sentence is harsh and excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J. — Sodomy, 1st Degree.) Present — Boomer, J. P., Green, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

People v. Cavender, 187 A.D.2d 1035, 593 N.Y.S.2d 481, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14099 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

187 A.D.2d 1035 (People v. Cavender) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related