People v. Cavalieri

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Cavalieri

276 N.E.2d 624, 29 N.Y.2d 762, 326 N.Y.S.2d 562, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 976

DecidedNovember 17, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 276 N.E.2d 624 (People v. Cavalieri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Cavalieri, 276 N.E.2d 624, 29 N.Y.2d 762, 326 N.Y.S.2d 562, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 976 (N.Y. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergak and Gibsok. Judges Breitel and Jasek concur in the following memorandum: The defendant as a witness was misinformed as to the immunity to which he would be entitled if his testimony were to be compelled (People v. Masiello, 28 N Y 2d 287). However, the information he received was indistinguishable from that given in People v. Mulligan (29 N Y 2d 20), on constraint of which we concur and vote to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergak and Gibsok. Judges Breitel and Jasek concur in the following memorandum: The defendant as a witness was misinformed as to the immunity to which he would be entitled if his testimony were to be compelled (People v. Masiello, 28 N Y 2d 287). However, the information he received was indistinguishable from that given in People v. Mulligan (29 N Y 2d 20), on constraint of which we concur and vote to affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 N.E.2d 624, 29 N.Y.2d 762, 326 N.Y.S.2d 562, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cavalieri-ny-1971.