People v. Cauley
This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 06673 (People v. Cauley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| People v Cauley |
| 2020 NY Slip Op 06673 |
| Decided on November 13, 2020 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on November 13, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, WINSLOW, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
1057 KA 19-02222
v
WILLIAM A. CAULEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
NICHOLAS B. ROBINSON, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (JOSEPH G. FRAZIER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
CAROLINE A. WOJTASZEK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (THOMAS H. BRANDT OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Sara Sheldon, J.), rendered September 9, 2019. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the second degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 140.25 [2]), defendant contends that his purported waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Even assuming, arguendo, that the waiver is invalid and thus does not preclude our review of defendant's challenge to the severity of his sentence, we conclude that there is no basis for the exercise of our authority to reduce the sentence as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [b]) because County Court imposed the minimum sentence authorized for a second felony offender convicted of a class D violent felony (see Penal Law §§ 60.05 [6]; 70.00 [6]; 70.02 [1] [b], [c]; 70.06 [6] [c]; 70.45 [2]; 140.25 [2]; People v Davis, 159 AD3d 1586, 1587 [4th Dept 2018], lv denied 31 NY3d 1080 [2018]; People v Barber, 106 AD3d 1533, 1533-1534 [4th Dept 2013]).
Entered: November 13, 2020
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2020 NY Slip Op 06673, 188 A.D.3d 1689, 132 N.Y.S.3d 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cauley-nyappdiv-2020.