People v. Cauley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cauley

151 A.D.2d 1041, 544 N.Y.S.2d 512, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8413

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 2, 1989·Published

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Although the determination whether an eligible youth is a youthful offender must affirmatively appear in the record (see, CPL 720.20 [1]), and although the court here failed to recite specifically that defendant was being denied youthful offender status, the record otherwise conclusively demonstrates, albeit by implication, that the court determined that defendant was not a youthful offender (see, People v Greene, 54 AD2d 621). (Appeal from judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J. — petit larceny.) Present —Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Although the determination whether an eligible youth is a youthful offender must affirmatively appear in the record (see, CPL 720.20 [1]), and although the court here failed to recite specifically that defendant was being denied youthful offender status, the record otherwise conclusively demonstrates, albeit by implication, that the court determined that defendant was not a youthful offender (see, People v Greene, 54 AD2d 621). (Appeal from judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J. — petit larceny.) Present —Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

People v. Cauley, 151 A.D.2d 1041, 544 N.Y.S.2d 512, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8413 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

151 A.D.2d 1041 (People v. Cauley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related