People v. Catts

245 A.D.2d 385, 665 N.Y.S.2d 586, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12762
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 8, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 245 A.D.2d 385 (People v. Catts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Catts, 245 A.D.2d 385, 665 N.Y.S.2d 586, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12762 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Marlow, J.), rendered March 15, 1996, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree under Superior Court Information No. 13/95, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence, and (2) a judgment of the same court, also rendered March 15, 1996, convicting him of assault in the first degree under Indictment No. 119/95, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

With respect to the defendant’s appeal of the judgment convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, we have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel with respect to this conviction is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

The defendant’s contention that the sentence of 5 to 15 years imprisonment for the conviction of assault in the first degree was excessive is without merit (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). The defendant was sentenced consistent with the plea agreement (see, People v Fornal, 221 AD2d 361, 362; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Although the sentence imposed was the maximum, the plea was in satisfaction of a four-count indictment which included a charge of attempted murder in the second degree (see, People v Blakeslee, 193 AD2d 958; [386]*386People v Harvey, 192 AD2d 956, 957). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Hahn
50 A.D.3d 1057 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 A.D.2d 385, 665 N.Y.S.2d 586, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-catts-nyappdiv-1997.