People v. Cato
This text of 33 A.D.3d 813 (People v. Cato) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated October 31, 2005 (People v Cato, 22 AD3d 863 [2005]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered February 11, 2004.
Ordered that the application is denied.
The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Florio, J.E, Krausman, Rivera and Covello, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 A.D.3d 813, 822 N.Y.S.2d 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cato-nyappdiv-2006.