People v. Catlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Catlin

31 A.D.2d 752, 297 N.Y.S.2d 372, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4801

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 13, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 31 A.D.2d 752 (People v. Catlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Catlin, 31 A.D.2d 752, 297 N.Y.S.2d 372, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4801 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered January 8, 1965, which convicted defendant of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposed sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted. The findings of fact below have not been considered on this appeal. Defendant, on September 30, 1964, prior to trial on October 27-28, 1964, made application to the trial court .to direct the stenographer of the Criminal 'Court of the City of New York to supply him with a copy of the minutes of the preliminary hearing that had been held, on the grounds that he was without funds or means to secure the minutes and that the minutes were material and necessary to aid his defense. The court [753]*753denied the application. This was error (People v. Montgomery, 18 N Y 2d 993). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered January 8, 1965, which convicted defendant of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposed sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted. The findings of fact below have not been considered on this appeal. Defendant, on September 30, 1964, prior to trial on October 27-28, 1964, made application to the trial court .to direct the stenographer of the Criminal 'Court of the City of New York to supply him with a copy of the minutes of the preliminary hearing that had been held, on the grounds that he was without funds or means to secure the minutes and that the minutes were material and necessary to aid his defense. The court [753]*753denied the application. This was error (People v. Montgomery, 18 N Y 2d 993). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.2d 752, 297 N.Y.S.2d 372, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-catlin-nyappdiv-1969.