People v. Cathey
This text of 690 N.W.2d 99 (People v. Cathey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE
v.
CATHEY
Supreme Court of Michigan.
SC: 126231, COA: 244626.
On order of the Court, the motion for leave to file supplemental brief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the April 6, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CORRIGAN, C.J., would grant leave to appeal to consider the dissenting opinion of Judge Murphy in the Court of Appeals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
690 N.W.2d 99, 471 Mich. 938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cathey-mich-2004.