People v. Catanzaro

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Catanzaro

194 N.E.2d 692, 13 N.Y.2d 986

DecidedOctober 31, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 194 N.E.2d 692 (People v. Catanzaro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Catanzaro, 194 N.E.2d 692, 13 N.Y.2d 986 (N.Y. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Beturn of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, as follows: Defendant Catanzaro contended that admission into evidence of material obtained in the course of an allegedly illegal search and seizure and of a confession allegedly involuntary as a matter of law was a denial and deprivation of his rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals held that there was no such denial or deprivation (see 13 N Y 2d 842).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Beturn of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, as follows: Defendant Catanzaro contended that admission into evidence of material obtained in the course of an allegedly illegal search and seizure and of a confession allegedly involuntary as a matter of law was a denial and deprivation of his rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals held that there was no such denial or deprivation (see 13 N Y 2d 842).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 N.E.2d 692, 13 N.Y.2d 986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-catanzaro-ny-1963.