People v. Cataldi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cataldi

198 A.D.2d 844, 605 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11470

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 198 A.D.2d 844 (People v. Cataldi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Cataldi, 198 A.D.2d 844, 605 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11470 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: The People concede that, because defendant served a six-month term of imprisonment before he was charged with a violation of conditions of probation, defendant’s resentence to a one-year term of imprisonment on the petit larceny counts was unlawful and must be vacated (see, CPL 430.10; People v Yannicelli, 40 NY2d 598, 602).

Defendant waived his right to appeal from the original sentence for his conviction of grand larceny and petit larceny, and County Court’s finding that defendant violated the conditions of probation as part of that sentence is supported by legally sufficient evidence and is not contrary to the weight of the evidence. We nevertheless exercise our discretionary power (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [b]) to modify the sentence following defendant’s conviction for that violation by reducing the term of imprisonment for grand larceny in the third degree to the six-month term already served. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, Drury, J. — Violation of Probation.) Present —Green, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: The People concede that, because defendant served a six-month term of imprisonment before he was charged with a violation of conditions of probation, defendant’s resentence to a one-year term of imprisonment on the petit larceny counts was unlawful and must be vacated (see, CPL 430.10; People v Yannicelli, 40 NY2d 598, 602).

Defendant waived his right to appeal from the original sentence for his conviction of grand larceny and petit larceny, and County Court’s finding that defendant violated the conditions of probation as part of that sentence is supported by legally sufficient evidence and is not contrary to the weight of the evidence. We nevertheless exercise our discretionary power (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [b]) to modify the sentence following defendant’s conviction for that violation by reducing the term of imprisonment for grand larceny in the third degree to the six-month term already served. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, Drury, J. — Violation of Probation.) Present —Green, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 A.D.2d 844, 605 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cataldi-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack