People v. Catalano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Catalano

205 A.D.2d 851, 614 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6080

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 9, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 205 A.D.2d 851 (People v. Catalano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Catalano, 205 A.D.2d 851, 614 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6080 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Casey, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Vogt, J.), rendered March 26, 1993, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of arson in the third degree.

Pursuant to a plea bargain, defendant entered a plea of guilty to the reduced charge of arson in the third degree and he was sentenced to a 1- to 3-year term of imprisonment in accordance with the plea bargain. Based upon our review of the record, we agree with defense counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues. The judgment should, therefore, be affirmed and defense counsel’s request to be relieved of her assignment should be granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Creeden, 150 AD2d 887).

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure and Weiss, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Casey, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Vogt, J.), rendered March 26, 1993, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of arson in the third degree.

Pursuant to a plea bargain, defendant entered a plea of guilty to the reduced charge of arson in the third degree and he was sentenced to a 1- to 3-year term of imprisonment in accordance with the plea bargain. Based upon our review of the record, we agree with defense counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues. The judgment should, therefore, be affirmed and defense counsel’s request to be relieved of her assignment should be granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Creeden, 150 AD2d 887).

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure and Weiss, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 851, 614 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6080, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-catalano-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack