People v. Catala

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Catala

269 A.D.2d 201, 703 N.Y.S.2d 715, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1301

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 10, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 269 A.D.2d 201 (People v. Catala) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Catala, 269 A.D.2d 201, 703 N.Y.S.2d 715, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1301 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert Straus, J.), rendered May 21, 1998, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of two counts of rape in the first degree and two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree, and sentencing him to two terms of 8 to 16 years and two terms of 3 to 6 years, all to be served concurrently, unanimously affirmed.

The record of defendant’s plea allocution, read as a whole and including defendant’s responses to the court’s questions establish that defendant voluntarily, intelligently and knowingly [202]*202pleaded guilty and waived his right to appeal. Accordingly, appellate review of defendant’s claims is foreclosed (see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). In any event, we would reject these claims. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Rubin, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert Straus, J.), rendered May 21, 1998, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of two counts of rape in the first degree and two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree, and sentencing him to two terms of 8 to 16 years and two terms of 3 to 6 years, all to be served concurrently, unanimously affirmed.

The record of defendant’s plea allocution, read as a whole and including defendant’s responses to the court’s questions establish that defendant voluntarily, intelligently and knowingly [202]*202pleaded guilty and waived his right to appeal. Accordingly, appellate review of defendant’s claims is foreclosed (see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). In any event, we would reject these claims. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Rubin, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 A.D.2d 201, 703 N.Y.S.2d 715, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-catala-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack