People v. Catala

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Catala

169 A.D.2d 730

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 14, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 169 A.D.2d 730 (People v. Catala) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Catala, 169 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from three judgments of the County Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.), all rendered August 8, 1989, convicting her of robbery in the second degree (two counts) under S.C.I. No. 89-00882-01, robbery in the second degree under S.C.I. No. 89-00922-01, and robbery in the first degree under S.C.I. No. 89-01093-01, upon her pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Balletta, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from three judgments of the County Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.), all rendered August 8, 1989, convicting her of robbery in the second degree (two counts) under S.C.I. No. 89-00882-01, robbery in the second degree under S.C.I. No. 89-00922-01, and robbery in the first degree under S.C.I. No. 89-01093-01, upon her pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Balletta, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 A.D.2d 730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-catala-nyappdiv-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack