People v. Castro

2026 NY Slip Op 01216
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 4, 2026
DocketInd. No. 1667/19
StatusPublished

This text of 2026 NY Slip Op 01216 (People v. Castro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Castro, 2026 NY Slip Op 01216 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

People v Castro (2026 NY Slip Op 01216)
People v Castro
2026 NY Slip Op 01216
Decided on March 4, 2026
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 4, 2026 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P.
LILLIAN WAN
LAURENCE L. LOVE
ELENA GOLDBERG VELAZQUEZ, JJ.

2022-05452
(Ind. No. 1667/19)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Ruben Castro, appellant.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Sean H. Murray of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Julian Joiris, and Allison Marculitis of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Phyllis Chu, J.), rendered June 6, 2022, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the United States Supreme Court's determination in Erlinger v United States (602 US 821) renders unconstitutional the persistent violent felony offender sentencing regime and that his sentence as a persistent violent felony offender (see Penal Law § 70.08) is unconstitutional in light of that determination is unpreserved for appellate review, as the defendant failed to raise a constitutional challenge before the Supreme Court (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v Hernandez, 43 NY3d 591, 597). We decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P., WAN, LOVE and GOLDBERG VELAZQUEZ, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Erlinger v. United States
602 U.S. 821 (Supreme Court, 2024)
People v. Hernandez
43 N.Y.3d 591 (New York Court of Appeals, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2026 NY Slip Op 01216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-castro-nyappdiv-2026.