People v. Castro

2021 NY Slip Op 01783, 140 N.Y.S.3d 759, 192 A.D.3d 1041
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 24, 2021
DocketInd. No. 1132-15
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 01783 (People v. Castro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Castro, 2021 NY Slip Op 01783, 140 N.Y.S.3d 759, 192 A.D.3d 1041 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

People v Castro (2021 NY Slip Op 01783)
People v Castro
2021 NY Slip Op 01783
Decided on March 24, 2021
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 24, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX, J.P.
HECTOR D. LASALLE
BETSY BARROS
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

2019-05303
(Ind. No. 1132-15)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Elvis Castro, appellant.


Jonathan B. Manley, Hauppauge, NY, for appellant.

Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Grazia DiVincenzo of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Richard Ambro, J.), rendered January 12, 2017, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that his attorney rendered ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to file a timely motion to suppress evidence is not properly before this Court, since, by pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited appellate review of his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel that did not directly involve the plea negotiation process and sentence (see People v Fields, 178 AD3d 847, 848; People v David, 163 AD3d 846; People v Donovan, 133 AD3d 615).

Accordingly, based on the foregoing determination, the defendant's remaining contentions, which solely regard the validity of the appeal waiver, have been rendered academic and the judgment must be affirmed.

HINDS-RADIX, J.P., LASALLE, BARROS and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Galicia
2024 NY Slip Op 04977 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
People v. Pena
204 A.D.3d 940 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Arce
2021 NY Slip Op 04555 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 01783, 140 N.Y.S.3d 759, 192 A.D.3d 1041, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-castro-nyappdiv-2021.